USER TESTING
Following the completion of the prototype, I conducted further user testing to ensure that the interaction between humans and the technology is seamless and clear. I formulated two different methods, one was an online testing with a pool of 70 participants, and the second was in a physical setting with 10 participants (user testing occurred one at a time).
RESEARCH METHOD
The app was tested on a total of 80 participants, both virtually and in person. All participants are university students ages 17-25. Each participant would be given a link to the high-definition prototype and have a maximum of 5 minutes to explore the application. After the 5 minutes mark, each of them would need to answer 5 basic open-ended questions in relation to the usability, interactivity, and aesthetic of the app.
RESEARCH RESULT
Clarity | Ussability | Userflow | Aesthetics | Practicality |
Font size needs to be larger, especially in for the “Recipe Finder” feature. | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | There needs to be more preference settings to be more user-friendly. |
The table below shows the areas the app was tested in and a determinant if its design or layout needs to be revised. A checkmark indicates that the app has successfully pass for a determinant factor.
Post a Comment